Thanks to Charles for permission to put this in my blog.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
IPso Jure by Peter Groves is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Pageviews from the past week
Pages
Society of Authors
IPso Jure YouTube Channel
A growing collection of intellectual property lectures and other material is on the IPso Jure YouTube channel. Follow the link to view and subscribe!
Dictionary of Intellectual Property
My Dictionary of Intellectual Property Law was published in February 2011 by Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd and I am now preparing a new edition. New definitions for it are on the IP Dictionary blawg, where you can also post critiques, suggestions for new terms to be included, and anything else related to the Dictionary.
Dictionary of Intellectual Property Law
Blog Archive
Labels
.eu TLD
(1)
.sucks
(1)
2019/790
(1)
4-5 Gray's Inn Square
(1)
A Run Through Intellectual Property
(4)
A Theory of Law
(1)
A Whiter Shade of Pale
(5)
abbreviations
(1)
absolute grounds
(2)
Absolutism
(26)
abuse of dominant position
(6)
account of profits
(1)
ACTA
(1)
actavis v eli lilley
(1)
admissions
(1)
advertising
(1)
Advice
(1)
advocate general
(1)
against intellecual monopoly
(1)
aggregation
(2)
Agreements
(1)
Albeniz
(1)
Alex Kozinski
(2)
alfredo ilardi
(1)
Animal Liberation
(1)
animals
(1)
apple
(3)
applications abandoned
(1)
appropriation art
(1)
arbitration
(1)
Architecture
(1)
archives
(2)
Arco lamps
(1)
Argentina
(1)
Arnold J
(1)
Arnold's Principle
(1)
Arrows
(1)
art de vivre
(1)
article 102 TFEU
(2)
artificial intelligence
(1)
assignment
(1)
Asturias
(1)
Australia
(6)
authorised repairers
(1)
authors
(1)
Autodesk
(1)
available to the public
(1)
Avatar
(1)
Bad faith
(2)
Bahamas
(1)
Bailii
(1)
Banksy
(1)
bartok pizzicato
(1)
BBC
(1)
Belgium
(2)
bémol
(1)
Bentham
(1)
Bently and Sherman
(1)
Bernard Olcott
(1)
Big Copyright
(1)
Big IP
(1)
BL v Armstrong
(1)
Black Sabbath
(1)
blackberry
(1)
Blue Book
(1)
Blueprinting
(1)
bob cumbow
(1)
bogart
(1)
boldrin and levine
(1)
book review
(9)
books
(1)
Boyle
(1)
brand
(1)
breach of confidence
(6)
brexit
(8)
British Library
(1)
Brompton Bicycle
(1)
Bulgaria
(2)
bullying
(5)
burlesque
(1)
business methods
(2)
business names
(2)
Cadbury
(3)
california
(1)
Canada
(2)
car manufacturer
(1)
careers
(1)
Cartels
(1)
cearta
(1)
celebrities
(1)
celebrity endorsement
(1)
character merchandising
(1)
charles clark
(1)
cheese
(1)
Chilling effects
(1)
China
(3)
CIPA
(1)
Cipriani
(1)
claim interpretation
(1)
class headings
(1)
Classification
(3)
clenched fist
(1)
Cliff Richard
(1)
cliff's law
(1)
Clinics
(1)
Closing the stable door after the horse has bolted
(1)
cloud computing
(1)
cluttering
(1)
co-existence agreements
(1)
co-ownership
(1)
colour trade mark
(1)
colours
(2)
comma splice
(1)
commission
(1)
commissioned designs
(1)
commodification
(1)
commodities
(1)
commoditization
(1)
common origin
(1)
common-law rights
(1)
commonplace
(2)
Communication to the public
(1)
Community registered designs
(8)
Community Trade Mark
(22)
Company names
(2)
comparable trade marks
(2)
comparative advertising
(1)
compensation
(1)
Competition law
(6)
complex products
(1)
compulsory licensing
(1)
computer games
(1)
computer programs
(2)
conditional access
(1)
conferences
(2)
confidential information
(6)
consent
(1)
construction
(1)
contempt
(1)
continuing professional development
(1)
Contract
(1)
Cookies
(1)
Copying
(1)
copyleft
(1)
Copyright
(138)
copyright infringement
(3)
Copyright Licensing Agency
(1)
corpus query system
(1)
correction of underpayment
(1)
corresponding trade marks
(1)
costs
(1)
counterclaim
(1)
Counterfeits
(3)
Court of Appeal
(3)
Court of Justice
(12)
cpd
(1)
creativity
(1)
Criminal offences
(6)
crossword
(1)
crown copyright
(1)
crown use
(1)
da vinci code
(1)
DABUS
(1)
damages
(6)
dan adin
(1)
Dangerous Dogs Act
(1)
data mining
(1)
data protection
(4)
Database right
(5)
databases
(4)
debate
(1)
defamation
(1)
derivative works
(1)
design right
(1)
Designs
(24)
dictated by function
(1)
dictionary of IP law
(1)
Digital locks
(1)
digital society
(1)
dilution
(2)
directive
(2)
directive 2015/2436
(1)
disclosure
(1)
Distance selling
(1)
distinctiveness
(3)
DMCA
(1)
Domain dispute
(1)
domain names
(3)
double patenting
(1)
Douglas Adams
(1)
downloading
(4)
drafting
(7)
drumming
(1)
Duran Duran
(1)
duration
(1)
Dylan
(3)
Dyson
(1)
e-books
(2)
e-commerce
(3)
earlier rights
(1)
easy access initiative
(1)
ebay
(1)
education
(2)
EFF
(1)
elanco v mandops
(1)
electronic communications
(1)
Electronic Frontier Foundation
(2)
email
(1)
employee
(2)
energy drinks
(1)
enforcement directive
(2)
ententen12
(1)
Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act
(3)
Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill
(1)
eoin o'dell
(1)
eran liss
(1)
estoppel
(1)
EU trade marks
(4)
European Commission
(4)
European Convention on Human Rights
(2)
European Parliament
(1)
European Patent Office
(3)
European Union
(11)
European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018
(2)
evergreening
(2)
evidence
(1)
evidence-based policy-making
(4)
exceptions
(3)
exclusions
(1)
exclusive licensee
(1)
exhaustion
(4)
expansionism
(1)
expression
(2)
extended collective licensing
(1)
extension
(2)
Fair dealing
(3)
Fair use
(3)
famous belgians
(1)
famous mark
(1)
fees
(2)
Fellows and Associates
(1)
File-sharing
(1)
filemot
(1)
film
(3)
films
(1)
financial times
(1)
follow on claims
(1)
Football
(1)
format rights
(1)
format shifting
(2)
Formula One
(2)
forum shopping
(1)
France
(3)
FRAND
(3)
Fred Hirsch
(1)
free speech
(1)
freedom to operate
(1)
freeze-plus compromise
(1)
functionality
(1)
GDPR
(1)
Gebrauchsmuster
(1)
general court
(1)
General Public Licence
(2)
generic pharmaceuticals
(1)
genericide
(1)
genetics
(1)
geographical indications
(3)
German grammar
(1)
germany
(2)
gLTD
(1)
Glyn v Weston
(1)
GNU
(2)
good faith
(1)
goodwill
(1)
google
(4)
graffiti
(1)
Grammar
(2)
Green Bag
(1)
Green Party
(1)
groundless threats
(5)
guernsey
(1)
Gummy Bears
(1)
Hallstadt
(1)
Hargreaves Review
(19)
hart publishing
(1)
Hartlepool
(1)
Herchel Smith lecture
(1)
High Court UK
(1)
hooper report
(3)
hot topics
(1)
hotlinking
(1)
hub
(1)
Human rights
(1)
Human Rights Act
(2)
hyperlinks
(1)
IBIL
(2)
ICANN
(1)
ideas
(3)
identity
(1)
illiteracy
(1)
image rights
(5)
immorality
(1)
implied covenants
(1)
importation
(1)
improver
(1)
indemnity costs
(1)
india
(9)
Indian trademark applications
(4)
indian trademark office
(2)
Indian Trademark Registry
(3)
indian trademark system
(1)
individual character
(1)
industrial application
(1)
industrial designs
(4)
industrial explotation
(1)
infopaq
(2)
infringement
(21)
Injunction
(2)
insufficiency
(1)
INTA
(1)
Intellectual Property
(7)
Intellectual Property Bill
(3)
intellectual property enterprise court
(4)
Intellectual Property Fraud
(1)
Intellectual property lectures
(1)
Intellectual Property Office
(2)
interim injunction
(2)
international trade marks
(1)
internet
(1)
interpretation
(3)
invalidity
(4)
Inventive step
(1)
inventors
(3)
IP dispute
(1)
IP Lawcast
(8)
IP management
(1)
IP textbook
(1)
IP translator
(1)
IP Unzipped
(1)
IPO
(1)
IPse Dixit
(2)
IPTV boxes
(1)
Iron Maiden
(1)
Irritating Things
(3)
Isle of Man
(1)
Israel
(1)
Italy
(1)
james boyle
(1)
Jane Lambert
(3)
je ne sais quoi
(1)
JIPLP
(1)
jobs
(1)
joint authorship
(1)
joint liability
(1)
journalists
(2)
joy
(1)
judicial review
(1)
jurisdiction
(1)
justifications for intellectual property
(1)
kirin amgen
(1)
Kitchin LJ
(1)
kraftwerk
(1)
L'Oreal v Bellure
(1)
Land grab
(1)
Land-Rover
(1)
last date to revive
(1)
law commission
(1)
law of property (miscellaneous provisions) act 1994
(1)
law reform
(1)
layers of protection
(1)
league table
(1)
legal deposit libraries
(1)
legal education
(1)
legal practice course
(1)
legal profession
(1)
legitimate interests
(1)
lending
(1)
leonard bernstein
(2)
levy
(2)
Lexis Nexis
(1)
libraries
(2)
licence
(2)
licence of right
(1)
licensing
(3)
likelihood of confusion
(6)
linking
(1)
Litigation
(4)
Locke
(1)
Lodsys
(1)
london 2012
(1)
lookalikes
(2)
lord hoffmann
(1)
lord neuberger
(1)
Lotus
(1)
Luxembourg
(1)
lysol
(1)
macaque
(1)
madrid protocol
(1)
magical powers of IP
(1)
making
(1)
making available
(1)
Mankind V Mercykind
(1)
marilyn monroe
(1)
Mark Webber
(1)
market exclusion agreement
(1)
mathematics
(1)
Max Planck Institute
(4)
MBL
(1)
means and ends
(8)
Meet the Bloggers
(1)
Megamos Crypto
(1)
meltwater
(1)
memorandum of understanding
(1)
mental acts
(1)
miles davis
(1)
miss recorder michaels
(1)
mobile phones
(1)
Moral rights
(1)
morality
(4)
moron in a hurry
(1)
moses pelham
(1)
motor industry
(2)
Motor Law
(1)
Motor Racing
(2)
motor vehicles
(1)
Music
(6)
musical combinations
(1)
musicals
(1)
must-match
(1)
nation branding
(1)
Nestlé
(2)
news
(2)
newspapers
(1)
Newswire
(1)
Ngaire Naffine
(1)
Nice Agreement
(2)
Ninth Circuit
(1)
NIPC
(3)
NLA
(2)
no deal
(1)
nominative fair use
(1)
nonpractising entities
(1)
Norwich Pharmacal order
(1)
novelty
(1)
Obviousness
(3)
ogooglebar
(1)
OHIM
(1)
Olcott International
(2)
olympics
(1)
omri rachum-twaig
(1)
online advertising
(1)
Open source
(3)
openstreetmap
(1)
opportunity knocks
(1)
Oppositions
(1)
Oracle
(1)
originality
(4)
Orin S. Kerr
(1)
orphan works
(8)
OSCLA
(1)
overclaiming
(1)
overlaps
(1)
overreaching
(2)
own name
(2)
ownership
(4)
Oxford Comma
(1)
Oxford IP Moot
(2)
Oxford Law School
(1)
oxford university
(1)
oxymoron
(1)
Paco de Lucia
(1)
paganini
(1)
Parallel Construction
(1)
parallel imports
(6)
parody
(3)
passing off
(15)
patent
(8)
patent attorneys
(1)
patent litigation
(2)
patent monetization entities
(1)
Patent Office
(3)
patentability
(1)
Patents
(54)
patents county court
(4)
patents court
(1)
Paternity right
(1)
patry
(1)
PDO
(2)
Peer to Patent
(2)
penalties
(1)
performers' protection
(1)
permitted acts
(4)
personality rights
(2)
Peter Singer
(1)
PGI
(1)
pharmaceuticals
(1)
photographs
(3)
plagiarism
(2)
pleonasm
(1)
Podcast
(18)
policy-based evidence-making
(1)
popular music
(1)
portability
(1)
Positional goods
(1)
Post Brexit
(1)
practice
(2)
pre-emptive enforcement
(1)
prejudice
(1)
press release
(1)
Privacy
(5)
private copying
(4)
private international law
(1)
Privy Council
(1)
Procol Harum
(3)
prohibited signs
(1)
Project Gutenberg
(1)
proms
(1)
property
(1)
protestantism
(1)
protocol on interpretation of Article 69
(2)
public administration
(1)
public domain
(3)
public lending right
(2)
public policy
(2)
publicity rights
(2)
publisher's association
(1)
publishing contract
(1)
purple colour
(2)
purposive approach
(1)
Python
(1)
Queen's Speech
(1)
quotation
(1)
rachmaninov
(1)
radio 3
(1)
Rand Paul
(1)
realtor
(1)
record review
(1)
red bull
(1)
redbubble
(1)
Redskins
(1)
registered Community design
(4)
registered design
(2)
registered designs
(4)
registered designs act
(2)
registered designs rules
(1)
Registering Trademark in India
(1)
Relative Grounds
(1)
Relentless
(1)
remastering
(1)
repair
(2)
repair clause
(1)
repeal
(1)
reprography
(1)
reputation
(1)
research
(1)
reverse engineering
(2)
reversion
(1)
revocation
(2)
richard dreyfuss
(1)
richard strauss
(1)
right to repair
(1)
rights of audience
(1)
Rihanna
(1)
Ripping
(1)
robots
(1)
Roger Dean
(1)
Rolls-Royce
(1)
roman catholicism
(1)
rounding conventions
(1)
Rouse Legal
(1)
royal family
(1)
royalties
(3)
rubik's cube
(1)
rule 139
(1)
Russia
(3)
s.297A
(1)
sampling
(1)
samsung
(1)
scams
(2)
sculpture
(1)
Seattle
(1)
second medical use
(1)
section 52
(3)
selfie
(1)
separate works
(1)
septic tanks
(1)
series
(1)
service out
(2)
set aside
(1)
settlement agreement
(1)
Shadow
(1)
shapes
(3)
shoes
(1)
significant figures
(1)
similarity
(3)
Simon Anholt
(1)
Singapore
(1)
Single Market
(1)
sir hugh laddie memorial lecture
(1)
Sky
(1)
slogan
(1)
small claims track
(1)
Social media
(1)
software
(8)
software patents
(6)
Solicitors
(2)
songs
(1)
sound recordings
(4)
south africa
(1)
spain
(1)
Spanish Caravan
(1)
Spare parts
(2)
spare rib
(1)
specialists
(1)
speculative invoicing
(1)
squeeze
(1)
Stackridge
(2)
standardised packaging
(1)
standards-essential patents
(3)
standards-setting
(1)
Stanley Fish
(1)
Star Wars
(1)
statements of the bleeding obvious
(2)
statistics
(1)
statutory instruments
(1)
steve reich
(1)
streaming
(1)
streisand effect
(1)
subconscious copying
(1)
substantial part
(1)
summary judgment
(3)
Supreme Court of the United States
(1)
svensson
(2)
Swedish
(1)
Swiss style claims
(1)
tabula in naufragio
(1)
takedown
(1)
taste
(1)
tautology
(1)
taxis
(1)
Technical Board of Appeal
(1)
technology transfer
(2)
Television
(1)
term
(4)
The Beast
(1)
The Doors
(1)
the fundamental interconnectedness of all things
(1)
The Great Intellectual Property Trade-off
(1)
the sketch engine
(1)
The Warwick Boar
(1)
till eulenspiegel
(1)
Tim Harford
(1)
time limits
(1)
Tip of the day
(9)
tobacco
(1)
trade mark
(7)
trade mark infringement
(6)
trade mark regulations 2018
(1)
trade mark use
(2)
Trade marks
(90)
trade marks act 1994
(1)
trade marks rules
(3)
trade secrets
(4)
trademark
(4)
Trademark Infringement
(1)
trademark rules 2017
(1)
trademarks
(3)
Tradename
(1)
transfer
(1)
transformative
(1)
trendy but pointless
(1)
trips
(1)
trolls
(8)
truth
(1)
turtles
(1)
Twisted
(1)
umberto eco
(1)
unfair advantage
(1)
unified patent court
(6)
unitary patent
(7)
united kingdom
(1)
United States
(7)
Universities
(1)
unlawful means
(1)
unlawful means conspiracy
(1)
unregistered design right
(8)
update
(1)
UPLS
(1)
USA
(4)
Use
(3)
usedSoft
(2)
USPTO
(1)
Utilitarianism
(1)
Utility models
(1)
validity
(3)
variations
(1)
Vernor
(1)
video lecture
(1)
Volkswagen AG
(1)
Vysotsky
(1)
wall
(1)
WeAdmire
(1)
weak trade marks
(1)
webinar
(1)
Website
(1)
Well-known mark
(1)
well-known mark in India
(2)
Wensleydale
(1)
west side story
(1)
whisky
(1)
WIPO
(1)
WIPR
(1)
withdrawal
(2)
work of artistic craftsmanship
(1)
world wide web
(1)
writing
(2)
Yorkshire
(1)
youtube
(2)
Zen Republic
(1)
Google Chat
Skype
IPso Jure by Peter Groves is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Search This Blog
Posts
Subscribe via email
Followers
Follow this blog
LEGALS
This blawg reflects my own opinions (or those of named contributors) and not those of CJ Jones Solicitors LLP or anyone else to whom they might be attributed. Nothing in this blawg is intended as legal advice, which is what I sell to make a living: if you are in need of advice you should consult someone suitably qualified to assist you. If you care to consult me, of course, I would be delighted.
Published by Motor Law Publications Limited, which is the owner of the UK registered trade mark IPso Jure.
Published by Motor Law Publications Limited, which is the owner of the UK registered trade mark IPso Jure.
1 comment:
Post a Comment