From The ICLR Blog: An obvious observation about obviousness: The law of patents is not always patently clear, but one point is obvious. The question of obviousness is not one that admits of endless el...
Better read the rest on their blog. It's a note on MedImmune Ltd v Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 1234, which the very name tells you can only be a patent case.
Saturday, 13 October 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment